Lindsay Clancy Trial
Jury deliberating
Our
Gavel
↗
READERS
theories and questions go up here
+ Your theory goes here
be the first — opens the board ↗
? Or just ask something
no theory required
supports: the defense's expert says so
supports: her psychologist says so
supports: if the voice was real — contested on cross
supports: the over-medication theory
contradicts: prosecution's expert says no
contradicts: no psychosis observed — but telehealth-only, says the defense
contested: planning, says the state · illness, says the defense
contradicts: prosecutors: planning means a working mind
contested: nobody charted danger to the kids — missed, says the defense
explains: why state of mind is the whole case
contradicts: prosecutors: intent rules out the middle option
supports: defense: 'You can't try this case in a vacuum'
explains: a viral claim about the care, heard and ruled on
The big question: could she
have stopped herself?
SETTLED: the jury got its
middle option
Both sides agree: she did it
Defense's famous expert: a
psychotic break
Her psychologist: she couldn't
tell right from wrong
The voice she says commanded
her
Prosecution's answer:
depression, not psychosis
Her own psychiatrist saw no
psychosis — the day before
Her phone tells two stories
The case for planning
The clinicians who never saw
danger to the kids
13 medications in four months
SETTLED: the TikTok challenge
that reached the courtroom
+
−
⤢
×
Purple = open question · Blue = from the record · Amber = reader theory. Every card carries its sources.
Full record & discussion →